Istanbul Health and Technology University INFORMATION PACKAGE / COURSE CATALOGUE
| Architecture | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
Course General Introduction Information
| Course Code: | MIM201 | ||||
| Course Name: | Architectural Design II (Studio) | ||||
| Course Semester: | Fall | ||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||
| Language of instruction: | |||||
| Course Requirement: | |||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||
| Type of course: | Necessary | ||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||
| Course Coordinator : | Öğr.Gör. HANDAN AŞ CEMREK | ||||
| Course Lecturer(s): | Handan Aş Çemrek | ||||
| Course Assistants: |
Course Purpose and Content
| Course Objectives: | The project subject of this period is the development of users in the developing and changing structure of the city, especially in Istanbul. It represents an approach that aims to make their daily lives easier. Cities are part of globalization Under its influence, spaces gradually change between old and new. This change, especially in Istanbul It affects both sides of a large city, and this change manifests itself as a transformation between old and new. is showing. However, the rapidity and dominance of this transformation negatively affects settlements. business and shopping centers are disrupting the existing fabric and sweeping away the traditional concepts of neighborhoods and districts. This Therefore, the aim of our project in this period is to create a center for damaged and degenerate spaces, to facilitate the daily life of its residents and to offer a solution. In this context, our project is an art It aims to design a Culture and Art Center consisting of a school and an administrative unit. |
| Course Content: | Our project aims to improve the social fabric of the place and the quality of life of the users. Drawing inspiration from art to space, using design and architectural abstraction elements, we create the most We aim to create readable and functional spaces by getting down to small meaningful pieces. Students have the opportunity to develop their own projects by learning these concepts throughout this semester. they will be. |
Learning Outcomes
|
The students who have succeeded in this course;
1) Grasping architectural abstraction skills 2) Land exploration, Building field session experience, Land model details, Layout Plan 3) Bubble diagram / Storyboard / Preliminary design principles 4) Spatial organization hierarchy 5) Complex building plan solutions, Preliminary project details 6) Acquiring 3D Model / Project presentation techniques skills |
Course Flow Plan
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction and explanation of the Project Topic. Question answer | None |
| 2) | Kandinsky Work Selection – Project Location Selection | None |
| 3) | Preparation of project requirements programs | None |
| 4) | Neighboring Building Stock / User character | None |
| 5) | Preparation of terrain model | None |
| 6) | Preparation of terrain model | None |
| 7) | Preliminary Correction Delivery | None |
| 7) | Preliminary Correction Delivery | None |
| 8) | Preliminary Jury Week | None |
| 9) | Digital Delivery of Visa Arguments – Final Mass Decisions Student Allocations | None |
| 10) | Final Mass Decisions Student Corrections – Loading System – Facade Design | None |
| 11) | Final Mass Decisions Student Corrections – Loading System – Facade Design | None |
| 12) | Final Mass Decisions Student Corrections – Loading System – Facade Design | None |
| 13) | Preliminary Allocation Delivery: Project Design Decisions – Land Settlement Decisions | None |
| 14) | Preliminary Allocation Delivery: Project Design Decisions – Land Settlement Decisions | None |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Point and Line to Plane By Wassily Kandinsky • ÇİÇEK, Ç., & KAYA, L. G. (2016). Soyut Resim Sanatının Mekânsal Tasarımına Aktarılması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(Özel (Special) 1), 9-17. • BULDUKLU, E., & BULDUKLU, D. (2020). ELEŞTİREL BİR İLETİŞİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK SOYUT RESİM SANATI ve MİMARİDE KULLANIMI: WASSILY KANDINSKY ÖRNEĞİ. Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 34-44. • BİÇER, Ü., & ERDİNÇ, S. Y. YAPI/TASARIM BULUŞMALARI. • ÖZCÜ, A. E., & ATANUR, G. (2020). KOVID-19 PANDEMİSİNİN KENT YAŞAMINA ETKİSİ: KAMUSAL ALAN ÜZERİNE DEĞERLENDİRMELER. Paradoks Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 16(2), 237- 250. • EKSPRESYONİZM’DE KANDİNSKY, V. M. R. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/The Journal of Social Sciences. • HASGÜL, E., & BİRER, E. (2022). Mekânda Bauhaus Etkisi: Kamusal Alanda Görünürlüğün Mekânsal İzdüşümü. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, (30), 73-87. • T.C. MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI, Anakara (2011), İnşaat Teknolojisi, Maket İskeleti Oluşturma. • KARAYILANOĞLU, G. (2020). Sürdürülebilir Kentleşme Ekseninde Kamusal Mekânın Kentsel İç Mekâna Dönüşümü: Helsinki Örneği. İdealkent, 11(31), 1909-1932. • Özkul, B. N. (2019). Kent ve İç Mimarlık Kesişiminde ‘Kentsel İç Mekân’. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Yakın Mimarlık Dergisi, 3(1), 1-17. • Kuter, N., & Çakmak, M. (2017). KAMUSAL DIŞ MEKÂNLARDA ENGELLİLER İÇİN TASARIM: ANKARA, SEĞMENLER PARKI ÖRNEĞİ. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 93-110. • ÇİFTCİ, S. K., & KAYHAN TUNALI, S. (2021). EVRENSEL TASARIM KAPSAMINDA KAMUSAL İÇ MEKÂNLARDA BİÇİMLENME. Journal Of International Social Research, 14(77). • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Şehir Tiyatroları Beyoğlu Sahnesi Mimari Proje Yarışması Şartname Eki Sözlük • Demirkan, H. (2015). Mekânlarda erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik ve yaşanabilirlik. Dosya, 36(3), 1-4. • Mamatoğlu, N. (2015). Mekanlarda erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik ve yaşanabilirlik. TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi, dosya, 36. • Belir, Ö. (2009). Mimari erişilebilirlik kılavuzu. Özürlüler Vakfı, 15, 2017. • DEMİREL, F., & İLİSULU, S. G. (2013). İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Beyoğlu Sahnesi Projesi ve Akustik Konfor Analizi. Politeknik Dergisi, 16(1), 19-28. |
| References: | Point and Line to Plane By Wassily Kandinsky • ÇİÇEK, Ç., & KAYA, L. G. (2016). Soyut Resim Sanatının Mekânsal Tasarımına Aktarılması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(Özel (Special) 1), 9-17. • BULDUKLU, E., & BULDUKLU, D. (2020). ELEŞTİREL BİR İLETİŞİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK SOYUT RESİM SANATI ve MİMARİDE KULLANIMI: WASSILY KANDINSKY ÖRNEĞİ. Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 34-44. • BİÇER, Ü., & ERDİNÇ, S. Y. YAPI/TASARIM BULUŞMALARI. • ÖZCÜ, A. E., & ATANUR, G. (2020). KOVID-19 PANDEMİSİNİN KENT YAŞAMINA ETKİSİ: KAMUSAL ALAN ÜZERİNE DEĞERLENDİRMELER. Paradoks Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 16(2), 237- 250. • EKSPRESYONİZM’DE KANDİNSKY, V. M. R. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi/The Journal of Social Sciences. • HASGÜL, E., & BİRER, E. (2022). Mekânda Bauhaus Etkisi: Kamusal Alanda Görünürlüğün Mekânsal İzdüşümü. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, (30), 73-87. • T.C. MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI, Anakara (2011), İnşaat Teknolojisi, Maket İskeleti Oluşturma. • KARAYILANOĞLU, G. (2020). Sürdürülebilir Kentleşme Ekseninde Kamusal Mekânın Kentsel İç Mekâna Dönüşümü: Helsinki Örneği. İdealkent, 11(31), 1909-1932. • Özkul, B. N. (2019). Kent ve İç Mimarlık Kesişiminde ‘Kentsel İç Mekân’. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Yakın Mimarlık Dergisi, 3(1), 1-17. • Kuter, N., & Çakmak, M. (2017). KAMUSAL DIŞ MEKÂNLARDA ENGELLİLER İÇİN TASARIM: ANKARA, SEĞMENLER PARKI ÖRNEĞİ. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 93-110. • ÇİFTCİ, S. K., & KAYHAN TUNALI, S. (2021). EVRENSEL TASARIM KAPSAMINDA KAMUSAL İÇ MEKÂNLARDA BİÇİMLENME. Journal Of International Social Research, 14(77). • İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Şehir Tiyatroları Beyoğlu Sahnesi Mimari Proje Yarışması Şartname Eki Sözlük • Demirkan, H. (2015). Mekânlarda erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik ve yaşanabilirlik. Dosya, 36(3), 1-4. • Mamatoğlu, N. (2015). Mekanlarda erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik ve yaşanabilirlik. TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi, dosya, 36. • Belir, Ö. (2009). Mimari erişilebilirlik kılavuzu. Özürlüler Vakfı, 15, 2017. • DEMİREL, F., & İLİSULU, S. G. (2013). İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Beyoğlu Sahnesi Projesi ve Akustik Konfor Analizi. Politeknik Dergisi, 16(1), 19-28. |
Course - Learning Outcome Relationship
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Medium | 3 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Research and Critical Thinking Skills: The ability to access information, evaluate it, record it, apply it, use it to express abstract ideas, evaluate opposing views, and test it with criteria and standards such as reaching well-questioned conclusions | 2 |
| 2) | Graphic Expression Skill: Ability to formally express each stage of the programming and design process using a variety of techniques, including two and three-dimensional hand drawings and computer technologies, to make appropriate presentations | 1 |
| 3) | Legal Responsibilities, Ethical and Professional Provisions: To understand the legal responsibilities of the architect in matters affecting design such as property rights, zoning and settlement regulations, user rights for public health, safety and welfare | 1 |
| 4) | Having Knowledge About World Architectural History: Understanding the rules of world and local architecture in architecture, landscape and urban design, and the climatic, technological, socio-economic, cultural factors and effects of historical heritage that shape and sustain these | |
| 5) | Environmental Systems and Sustainable Design: To understand the basic principles in the design of environmental systems and to be able to protect artificial resources and create healthy buildings and settlements in architectural and urban design decisions of sustainability | 1 |
| 6) | Formal Composition and Design Skills: Understanding the formation, development and applications of visual perception and arrangement systems in architectural and urban design and the ability to apply basic architectural principles at the level of building, interior and settlement design | 3 |
| 7) | Load-bearing Systems: Understanding the principles of behavior of structures standing with vertical and lateral forces and the development and applications of contemporary load-bearing systems | 1 |
| 8) | Building Materials and Applications: Understanding the principles and standards regarding the production, use and applications of building materials and components | 1 |
| 9) | Construction Management and Application Skills: Understanding the basic principles of office organization, business planning, marketing, financial management, project management, risk reduction and leadership, and the issues of globalization, expanding application area and diversity that affect the profession |
Learning Activity and Teaching Methods
| Course | |
| Proje Hazırlama | |
| Uygulama (Modelleme, Tasarım, Maket, Simülasyon, Deney vs.) |
Measurement and Evaluation Methods and Criteria
| Homework | |
| Uygulama | |
| Sunum | |
| Uzman / Jüri Değerlendirmesi |
Assessment & Grading
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Homework Assignments | 2 | % 40 |
| Preliminary Jury | 1 | % 20 |
| Final | 1 | % 40 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
| total | % 100 | |
İş Yükü ve AKTS Kredisi Hesaplaması
| Activities | Number of Activities | Workload |
| Course Hours | 13 | 104 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 112 |
| Jury | 1 | 8 |
| Final | 1 | 8 |
| Total Workload | 232 | |